Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPonce, Hiram
dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Villaseñor, Lourdes
dc.contributor.otherCampus Ciudad de Méxicoes
dc.identifier.citationPonce, H. y Martinez-Villaseñor, L. (2017). Interpretability of artificial hydrocarbon networks for breast cancer classification. En: IJCNN 2017 : proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, (2017-may), (pp. 3535-3542). Piscataway, NJ : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. DOI:
dc.description.abstractIn machine learning, interpretability refers to understand the underlying behavior of the prediction of a model in order to identify diagnosis criteria and/or new rules from its output. Interpretability contributes to increase the usability of the method. Also, it is relevant in decision support systems, such as in medical applications. White-box models like tree-based, rule-based and linear models are considered the most comprehensible, but less accurate or simplistic. In contrast, black-box models like nonlinear and ensemble models are more accurate hence more complex to interpret. Thus, a trade-off between accuracy and interpretability is often made when building models to support human experts in a decision-making process. Artificial hydrocarbon networks (AHN) is a supervised learning method that has been proved to be very effective for regression and classification problems. In fact, its training process suggests a kind of interpretability. Thus, the objective of this work is to present first efforts proving the capacity of artificial hydrocarbon networks (AHN) to deliver interpretable models. In order to assess the interpretability of AHN, we address the breast cancer problem using a public dataset. Results showed that AHN can be transformed in treebased and rule-based models preserving high accuracy in the output classification. © 2017 IEEE.en
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.en
dc.relation.ispartofREPOSITORIO SCRIPTAes
dc.rightsAcceso Cerradoes
dc.sourceIJCNN 2017 : proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networksen
dc.subjectArtificial intelligenceen
dc.subjectDecision makingen
dc.subjectDecision support systemsen
dc.subjectEconomic and social effectsen
dc.subjectSupervised learningen
dc.subjectBreast cancer classificationsen
dc.subjectDecision making processen
dc.subjectDiagnosis criteriaen
dc.subjectRule-based modelsen
dc.subjectSupervised learning methodsen
dc.subjectTraining processen
dc.subjectWhite-box modelsen
dc.subjectLearning systemsen
dc.subjectMedical applicationsen
dc.subject.classificationINGENIERÍA Y TECNOLOGÍAes
dc.titleInterpretability of artificial hydrocarbon networks for breast cancer classificationen
dc.typeContribución a congresoes
dcterms.bibliographicCitationA. A. Freitas, “Comprehensible classification models: A position paper,” ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2014.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationR. Piltaver, M. Lustrek, M. Gams, and S. Martincic-Ipsic, “What makes classification trees comprehensible?” Expert Systems With Applications, vol. 62, no. 15, pp. 333–346, 2016.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJ. Huysmans, K. Dejaeger, C. Mues, J. Vanthienen, and B. Baesens, “An empirical evaluation of the comprehensibility of decision table, tree and rule based predictive models,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 141–154, 2011.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationB. Letham and C. Rudin, “Interpretable classifiers using rules and bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction model,” Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Tech. Rep. 609, August 2013.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationH. Ponce, P. Ponce, and A. Molina, Artificial Organic Networks: Artificial Intelligence Based on Carbon Networks, ser. Studies in Computational Intelligence. Springer, 2014, vol. 521.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation——, “The development of an artificial organic networks toolkit for LabVIEW,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 478–492, 2015.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation——, “Artificial hydrocarbon networks fuzzy inference system,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, pp. 1–13, 2013.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationH. Ponce, L. Miralles-Pechuan, and L. Martínez-Villasenor, “A flexible approach for human activity recognition using artificial hydrocarbon networks,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 11, p. 1715, 2016.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationH. Ponce, L. Martínez-Villasenor, and L. Miralles-Pechúan, “A novel wearable sensor-based human activity recognition approach using artificial hydrocarbon networks,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 7, p. 1033, 2016.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationA. Bibal and B. Frenay, “Interpretability of machine learning models and representations: An introduction,” in Proceedings on ESANN, 2016, pp. 77–82.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationD. Martens, J. Vanthienen, W. Verbeke, and B. Baesens, “Performance of classification models from a user perspective,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 782–793, 2011.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationO. Maimon and L. Rokach, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2005.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationO. L. Mangasarian, W. N. Street, and W. H. Wolberg, “Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis via linear programming,” Operations Research, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 570–577, 1995.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationA. Molina, H. Ponce, P. Ponce, G. Tello, and M. Ramírez, “Artificial hydrocarbon networks fuzzy inference systems for CNC machines position controller,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 72, no. 9-12, pp. 1465–1479, 2014.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationH. Ponce, E. Moya-Albor, and J. Brieva, A Novel Artificial Organic Controller With Hermite Optical Flow Feedback for Mobile Robot Navigation. InTech, 2016, ch. 6, pp. 145–169.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationH. Ponce, L. Miralles-Pechuán, and L. Martínez-Villaseñor, “Artificial hydrocarbon networks for online sales prediction,” in Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Its Applications, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, O. Pichardo, O. Herrera, and G. Arroyo, Eds., vol. 9414. Springer, 2015, pp. 498–508.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationW. H. Wolberg and O. L. Mangasarian, “Multisurface method of pattern separation for medical diagnosis applied to breast cytology,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 87, United States of America, December 1990, pp. 9193–9196.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationP. B. Tintu and R. Paulin, “Detect breast cancer using fuzzy c means techniques in wisconsin prognostic breast cancer (WPBC) data sets,” International Journal of Computer Applications TEchnology and Research, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 614 –617, 2013.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationH. Asri, H. Mousannif, H. A. Moatassime, and T. Noel, “Using machine learning algorithms for breast cancer risk prediction and diagnosis,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 83, pp. 1064 – 1069, 2016.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationF. Wang and C. Rudin, “Falling rule lists,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, vol. 38, 2015, pp. 1013–1022.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationS. B. Kotsiantis, B. Sotiris, I. Zaharakis, and P. Pintelas, “Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques,” in Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Emerging Artificial Intelligence Applications in Computer Engineering, 2007, pp. 3 – 24.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationY.-G. Kim, M.-S. Jang, K.-S. Cho, and G.-T. Park, “Performance comparison between backpropagation, neuro-fuzzy network, and SVM,” in Computer Sicence - Theory and Applications, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, D. Grigoriev, J. Harrison, and E. A. Hirsch, Eds., vol. 3967. Springer-Verlag, 2006, pp. 438–446.en
dc.description.versionVersión aceptadaes

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Acceso Cerrado
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Acceso Cerrado