Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOlivares-Benitez, Elias
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-García, Jacqueline Y.
dc.contributor.authorNúñez-Ríos, Juan E.
dc.contributor.otherCampus Guadalajaraes
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-19T15:58:22Z
dc.date.available2020-06-19T15:58:22Z
dc.date.issued2020-02
dc.identifier.citationAblanedo Rosas, J. H., Campanur, A. G., Olivares Benítez, E., Sánchez García, Y. Y. y Núñez Ríos, J. E. (2020). Operational efficiency of mexican water utilities : results of a double-bootstrap data envelopment analysis. Water, 12 (2). DOI: 10.3390/w12020553en
dc.identifier.issn2073-4441
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12552/5188
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w12020553
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this paper is to estimate the operational efficiency of Mexican water utilities and identify the context variables that impact their efficiency. In particular, a bootstrap data envelopment analysis (DEA) and a bootstrap truncated regression analysis are combined in a two-stage research method. In the first stage, an input-oriented DEA model is used to determine bootstrap efficiency scores. Then, the corrected distribution function of the efficiency scores is used to estimate a truncated regression which is aimed to identify the significant influential context variables. Three categorical and two continuous context variables are considered in the analysis. Results show that only one context variable has a significant impact on the water utilities efficiency scores. Managerial recommendations are drawn from the analysis. It is suggested that water utilities continue or implement wastewater treatment, persist in decreasing and controlling leakage across the distribution network, and maximizing sewer coverage. © 2020 by the authors. Water, MDPI AGen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI AGen
dc.relation.ispartofREPOSITORIO SCRIPTAes
dc.relation.ispartofREPOSITORIO NACIONAL CONACYTes
dc.relation.ispartofOPENAIREes
dc.relation.ispartofseries12;2
dc.rightsAcceso Abiertoes
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0*
dc.rights.urihttp://sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/2073-4441/es/
dc.sourceWater (Switzerland)en
dc.subjectBootstrap data envelopment analysisen
dc.subjectData envelopment analysisen
dc.subjectDouble-bootstrap approachen
dc.subjectWater utilitiesen
dc.subjectWatermanagementen
dc.subjectData envelopment analysisen
dc.subjectDistribution functionsen
dc.subjectEfficiencyen
dc.subjectRegression analysisen
dc.subjectWastewater treatmenten
dc.subjectWater managementen
dc.subjectContext variablesen
dc.subjectDEA modelsen
dc.subjectDouble bootstrapsen
dc.subjectOperational efficienciesen
dc.subjectResearch methodsen
dc.subjectWater utilityen
dc.subjectLeakage (fluid)en
dc.subjectBootstrappingen
dc.subjectData envelopment analysisen
dc.subjectEstimation methoden
dc.subjectLeakageen
dc.subjectRegression analysisen
dc.subjectResearch worken
dc.subjectSewageen
dc.subjectWater useen
dc.subject.classificationINGENIERÍA Y TECNOLOGÍAes
dc.subject.classificationCIENCIAS SOCIALESes
dc.subject.classificationIngenieríaes
dc.subject.classificationCiencias Económicas y Empresarialeses
dc.titleOperational efficiency of mexican water utilities : results of a double-bootstrap data envelopment analysisen
dc.typeArtículoes
dcterms.audienceInvestigadoreses
dcterms.audienceEstudianteses
dcterms.audienceMaestroses
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHalkos, G.E.; Tzeremes, N.G. The effect of access to improved water sources and sanitation on economic efficiency: The case of sub-Saharan African countries. S. Afr. J. Econ. 2012, 80, 246–263.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationConnor, R. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World, 1st ed.; UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme, Ed.; UNESCO Publishing: Paris, France, 2015. Water 2020, 12, 553 23 of 25en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOECD. OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050; OECD Environmental Outlook; OECD: Paris, France, 2012; ISBN 9789264122161.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAnwandter, L.; Ozuna, T.J. Can public sector reforms improve the efficiency of public water utilities? Environ. Dev. Econ. 2002, 7, 687–700.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBadillo-Piña, I.; Orduñez-Zavala, E.; Tejeida-Padilla, R. Rainfall use to improve the sustainability of the hydraulic system in the valley of Mexico.In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Conference of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, Waterloo, ON, Canada, 18–23 July 2010; Volume 5, pp. 428–446.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCONAGUA. Numeragua; CONAGUA: Mexico City, México, 2017.es
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKauffer, E. Contrasting water securities: The Mexican state facing downstream stakeholders in the Suchiate transboundary river basin. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2019, 35, 30–48.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDe Faraia, R.C.; Moreira, T.B.S.; Souza, G.S. Public versus private water utilities: Empirical evidence for Brazilian companies. Econ. Bull. 2005, 8, 1–7.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFeigenbaum, S.; Teeples, R. Public Versus Private Water Delivery: A Hedonic Cost Approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1983, 65, 672.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGarcía-Rubio, M.A.; González-Gómez, F.; Guardiola, J. Performance and ownership in the governance of urban water. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Munic. Eng. 2010, 163, 51–58.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGonzález-Gómez, F.; García-Rubio, M.A.; Alcalá-Olid, F.; Ortega-Díaz, M.I. Outsourcing and Efficiency in the Management of Rural Water Services. Water Resour. Manag. 2013, 27, 731–747.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKirkpatrick, C.; Parker, D.; Zhang, Y.-F. An Empirical Analysis of State and Private-Sector Provision of Water Services in Africa. World Bank Econ. Rev. 2006, 20, 143–163.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationShaoul, J. A Critical Financial Analysis of the Performance of Privatised Insustries: The Case of the Water Industry in England and Wales. Crit. Perspect. Account. 1997, 8, 479–505.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMarques, R.C. Comparing private and public performance of Portuguese water services. Water Policy 2008, 10, 25–42.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDe Witte, K.; Marques, R.C. Capturing the environment, a metafrontier approach to the drinking water sector. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 2009, 16, 257–271.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSáez-Fernández, F.J.; González-Gómez, F.; Picazo-Tadeo, A.J. Opportunity Costs of Ensuring Sustainability in Urban Water Services. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2011, 27, 693–708.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVishwakarma, A.; Kulshrestha, M.; Amulya Nyathikala, S.; Kulshreshtha, M. Cost efficiency benchmarking of urban water supply utilities: The case of an Indian state. Water Environ. J. 2016, 30, 77–87.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCabrera, E.; Estruch-Juan, E.; Molinos-Senante, M. Adequacy of DEA as a regulatory tool in the water sector. The impact of data uncertainty. Environ. Sci. Policy 2018, 85, 155–162.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGadanakis, Y.; Bennett, R.; Park, J.; Areal, F.J. Improving productivity and water use efficiency: A case study of farms in England. Agric. Water Manag. 2015, 160, 22–32.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMaziotis, A.; Molinos-Senante, M.; Sala-Garrido, R. Assesing the Impact of Quality of Service on the Productivity of Water Industry: A Malmquist-Luenberger Approach for England and Wales. Water Resour. Manag. 2017, 31, 2407–2427.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPointon, C.; Matthews, K. Dynamic efficiency in the English and Welsh water and sewerage industry. Omega 2016, 58, 86–96.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSong, M.; Wang, R.; Zeng, X. Water resources utilization efficiency and influence factors under environmental restrictions. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 184, 611–621.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWang, S.; Zhou, L.; Wang, H.; Li, X. Water Use Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors in China: Based on the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)—Tobit Model. Water 2018, 10, 832.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationZhou, X.; Luo, R.; Yao, L.; Cao, S.; Wang, S.; Lev, B. Assessing integrated water use and wastewater treatment systems in China: A mixed network structure two-stage SBM DEA model. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 185, 533–546.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGarfield, E. Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science 1972, 178, 471–479.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNarin, F.; Olivastro, D.; Stevens, K.A. Bibliometrics/Theory, Practice and Problems. Eval. Rev. 1994, 18, 65–76.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBonilla, C.A.; Merigó, J.M.; Torres-Abad, C. Economics in Latin America: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 2015, 105, 1239–1252.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBerg, S.; Marques, R.C. Quantitative studies of water and sanitation utilities: A benchmarking literature survey. Water Policy 2011, 13, 591–606. Water 2020, 12, 553 24 of 25en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDe Witte, K.; Marques, R.C. Designing performance incentives, an international benchmark study in the water sector. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 18, 189–220.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationThanassoulis, E. DEA and its use in the regulation of water companies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2000, 127, 1-13.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAida, K.; Cooper, W.W.; Pastor, J.T.; Sueyoshi, T. Evaluating Water Supply Services in Japan with RAM: A Range-adjusted Measure of Inefficiency. Omega 1998, 26, 207–232.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationThanassoulis, E. The use of data envelopment analysis in the regulation of UK water utilities: Water distribution. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2000, 126, 436–453.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLiu, J.S.; Lu, L.Y.Y. An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2012, 63, 528–542.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMolinos-Senante, M.; Farías, R. Evaluation of the influence of economic groups on the efficiency and quality of service of water companies: An empirical approach for Chile. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 23251–23260.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHu, Z.; Yan, S.; Yao, L.; Moudi, M. Efficiency evaluation with feedback for regional water use and wastewater treatment. J. Hydrol. 2018, 562, 703–711.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSimar, L.; Wilson, P.W. Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. J. Econ. 2007, 136, 31–64.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPawsey, N.; Ananda, J.; Hoque, Z. Rationality, accounting and benchmarking water businesses. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag. 2018, 31, 290–315.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDe Witte, K.; Marques, R.C. Designing Incentives in Local Public Utilities: An International Comparison of the Drinking Water Sector. SSRN Electron. J. 2007. Available at SSRN 1084867.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMbuvi, D.; De Witte, K.; Perelman, S. Urban water sector performance in Africa: A step-wise bias corrected efficiency and effectiveness analysis. Util. Policy 2012, 22, 31–40.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAnanda, J. Evaluating the Performance of Urban Water Utilities: Robust Nonparametric Approach. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2014, 140, 04014021.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCarvalho, P.; Marques, R.C. The influence of the operational environment on the efficiency of water utilities. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 2698–2707.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGuerrini, A.; Romano, G.; Campedelli, B. Economies of Scale, Scope, and Density in the Italian Water Sector: A Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Water Resour. Manag. 2013, 27, 4559–4578.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLo Storto, C. Are Public-Private Partnerships a Source of Greater Efficiency in Water Supply? Results of a Non-Parametric Performance Analysis Relating to the Italian Industry. Water 2013, 5, 2058–2079.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMarques, R.C.; Berg, S.; Yane, S. Nonparametric benchmarking of Japanese water utilities: Institutional and environmental factors affecting efficiency. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2014, 140, 562–571.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMolinos-Senante, M.; Donoso, G.; Sala-Garrido, R.; Villegas, A. Benchmarking the efficiency of the Chilean water and sewerage companies: A double-bootstrap approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 8432–8440.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPinto, F.S.; Simões, P.; Marques, R.C. Water services performance: Do operational environment and quality factors count? Urban Water J. 2017, 14, 773–781.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationZschille, M.; Walter, M. The performance of German water utilities: A (semi)-parametric analysis. Appl. Econ. 2012, 44, 3749–3764.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGüngör-Demirci, G.; Lee, J.; Keck, J. Measuring water utility performance using nonparametric linear programming. Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 2018, 34, 206–220.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGüngör-Demirci, G.; Lee, J.; Keck, J. Assessing the Performance of a California Water Utility Using TwoStage Data Envelopment Analysis. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2018, 144, 05018004.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRenzetti, S.; Dupont, D.P. Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Municipal Water Suppliers: The Role of Environmental Factors. Land Econ. 2009, 85, 627–636.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCabrera, E.; Cabrera, E. Regulation of Urban Water Services. An Overview; IWA Publishing: London, UK, 2016; Volume 15, p. 9781780408187.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCharnes, A.; Cooper, W.W.; Rhodes, E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1978, 2, 429–444.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLiu, J.S.; Lu, L.Y.Y.; Lu, W.-M.; Lin, B.J.Y. Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega 2013, 41, 3–15.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBanker, R.D.; Charnes, A.; Cooper, W.W. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Manag. Sci. 1984, 30, 1078–1092.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAndersen, P.; Petersen, N.C. A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Manag. Sci. 1993, 39, 1261–1264. Water 2020, 12, 553 25 of 25en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSexton, T.R.; Silkman, R.H.; Hogan, A.J. Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. New Dir. Progr. Eval. 1986, 1986, 73–105.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDoyle, J.; Green, R. Efficiency and Cross-Efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1994, 45, 567.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHollingsworth, B.; Smith, P. Use of ratios in data envelopment analysis. Appl. Econ. Lett. 2003, 10, 733–735.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEmrouznejad, A.; Amin, G.R. DEA models for ratio data: Convexity consideration. Appl. Math. Model. 2009, 33, 486–498.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHatami-Marbini, A.; Toloo, M. Data envelopment analysis models with ratio data: A revisit. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 133, 331–338.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDong, X.; Du, X.; Li, K.; Zeng, S.; Bledsoe, B.P. Benchmarking sustainability of urban water infrastructure systems in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 170, 330–338.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWibowo, A.; Alfen, H.W. Benchmarking the efficiencies of Indonesia’s municipal water utilities using Stackelberg data envelopment analysis. Benchmarking An Int. J. 2015, 22, 588–609.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAblanedo-Rosas, J.H.; Gao, H.; Zheng, X.; Alidaee, B.; Wang, H. A study of the relative efficiency of Chinese ports: A financial ratio-based data envelopment analysis approach. Expert Syst. 2010, 27, 349–362.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAblanedo-Rosas, J.H.; Gemoets, L.A. Measuring the efficiency of Mexican airports. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2010, 16, 343–345.en
dc.description.versionVersión del editores
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/w12020553


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Acceso Abierto
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Acceso Abierto