De Haro Romo, VicenteVicenteDe Haro Romo2022-07-152022-07-152020https://scripta.up.edu.mx/handle/20.500.12552/141710.15446/ideasyvalores.v69n174.67642This paper presents Kant´s and Fichte´s arguments to put forward the ethical and particular duty of beneficence. It appraises both philosophers' reasons to locate this duty in a special position in their respective system of duties, contrary to the general criteria of these systems. It also comments in a comparative way, on the role of the faculty of judgment towards the margin of latitude that this ethical duty implies in each of both thinkers. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.esResource Types::text::journal::journal article