Garcia-Terraza, Abril L.Abril L.Garcia-TerrazaJimenez-Collado, DavidDavidJimenez-ColladoSanchez-Sanoja, FranciscoFranciscoSanchez-SanojaArteaga-Rivera, José Y.José Y.Arteaga-RiveraMorales Flores, NormaNormaMorales FloresPérez-Solórzano, SofíaSofíaPérez-SolórzanoGarfias, YonathanYonathanGarfiasGraue-Hernández, Enrique O.Enrique O.Graue-HernándezNavas, AlejandroAlejandroNavas2023-07-182023-07-182022https://scripta.up.edu.mx/handle/20.500.12552/396610.3389/fmed.2022.893688Purpose: To evaluate repeatability, reproducibility, and accordance between ocular surface measurements within three different imaging devices. Methods: We performed an observational study on 66 healthy eyes. Tear meniscus height, non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT) and meibography were measured using three corneal imaging devices: Keratograph 5M (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), Antares (Lumenis, Sidney, Australia), and LacryDiag (Quantel Medical, Cournon d'Auvergne, France). One-way ANOVAs with post hoc analyses were used to calculate accordance between the tear meniscus and NITBUT. Reproducibility was assessed through coefficients of variation and repeatability with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Reliability of meibography classification was analyzed by calculating Fleiss' Kappa Index and presented in Venn diagrams. Copyright © 2022 Frontiers in MedicineenReliability, repeatability, and accordance between three different corneal diagnostic imaging devices for evaluating the ocular surfaceResource Types::text::journal::journal article