Verdeja González, José IgnacioJosé IgnacioVerdeja GonzálezQuintana, María JoséMaría JoséQuintanaGonzalez-Ojeda, RobertoRobertoGonzalez-OjedaVerdeja González, Luis FelipeLuis FelipeVerdeja González2023-08-042023-08-042013978-162993309-2https://scripta.up.edu.mx/handle/20.500.12552/4686A construction steel (shipbuilding strip) obtained by Advanced Thermomechanical Controlled Rolling Processes presents a room temperature banded ferrite-pearlite microstructure, and when superplastically deformed at 800°C with a strain rate of 5.85x10-5 s-1, the bands disappear as there is grain boundary sliding and grain cluster rotation. Nevertheless, the superplastic deformation does not imply a decrease in mechanical properties, as room temperature tests with strain rates of 1.46x10-3 s -1 with the steel previously deformed in superplastic conditions (until a 110% of straining) result in similar mechanical data. If the steel is deformed at 750°C with low strain rates, cooling results in a microstructure formed only by ferrite and carbides (the pearlitic phase disappears). This behavior may be explained, from a thermodynamical point of view, by the effect of negative hydrostatic pressure during the tensile test and the pronounced ferrite- and carbide-former capacity of Ti and Nb microalloying elements. The samples, tensile tested, in both the hot rolled raw state and superplastically deformed and then room temperature tested, show in the fracture surface SEM analysis almost identical features: decohesions surrounding MnS and (C,N)(Ti,Nb) precipitates and between ferrite and pearlite grains, as well as bedding.Microstructural changes of a construction steel caused by hot deformationResource Types::text::conference output::conference proceedings::conference paper