CRIS

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://scripta.up.edu.mx/handle/20.500.12552/1

Browse

Settings

Access type: UnknownSubject: search.filters.subject.Interdisciplinarity

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Dominance of leading business schools in top journals: Insights for increasing institutional representation
    (Elsevier B.V., 2025)
    Romero-Silva, Rodrigo  
    ;
    Marsillac, Erika
    ;
    De Leeuw, Sander
    The competitive push for business schools to publish in prestigious journals has resulted in a disproportionate number of papers in prestigious Management and Operations Research/Management Science (OR/MS) journals coming from a select group of institutions. Our analysis shows the Matthew effect of prestigious journals favors established schools with 51.2 % of papers in 18 Management ABS 4* journals and 61.3 % of papers in 3 OR/MS ABS 4* journals involving authors from the 100 top business schools identified by the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD). Citation patterns are similarly concentrated among papers authored by scholars from UTD-listed business schools, with nearly 80 % of citations from 4* Management journals directed to equally rated 4* Management journals (67.8 % for 4* OR/MS journals). An initial regression analysis suggested a positive correlation between the percentage of papers in a journal attributed to authors affiliated with those leading business schools and journal citation performance. However, further examination using multi-level regression adjusted for journal prestige, using the ABS and FT50 lists, showed a negative interaction effect on citation rates for papers from these schools in prestigious OR/MS journals. This insightful finding was confirmed by a post-hoc comparison revealing no significant citation advantage in prestigious journals for papers from leading business schools over those from a broader range of institutions. Thus, while leading business schools benefit from disproportionate space in prestigious journals, this does not translate to a citation advantage for the journals themselves, indicating no Matthew effect at the journal level driven by these schools. We argue that our findings show a unique opportunity for prestigious journals and business schools to expand collaborations with institutions in geographies historically underrepresented without a significant impact on the citation performance of those journals. This inclusion would only benefit research excellence, as our results demonstrate convergence in citation rates, citation patterns on external research areas, and topics across both subsets of papers—from leading institutions and those from a broader institutional spectrum—published in prestigious journals, indicating that diversifying contributions does not compromise the performance of these journals. ©The authors ©Elsevier.
      12
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Trabajo interdisciplinario en las profesiones de la voz humana: retos, límites y proyecciones
    (Fundación Universitaria María Cano, 2024)
    Calvache Mora, Carlos Alberto
    ;
    García Cervera, Natalia María
    ;
    Cantor Cutiva, Lady Catherine
    ;
    Constantini, Ana Carolina
    ;
    Zubiaur Gomar, Fermin M.
    This document summarizes the main contributions of the panel discussion titled "Interdisciplinary work in the human voice professions: challenges, limits and projections" organized by the Vocology Center on July 18, 2023. The event brought together leaders and representatives from various associations related to the human voice, including professionals from the clinical, artistic, vocal rehabilitation, occupational voice, vocal pedagogy, and other related disciplines. The purpose of this panel discussion was to promote a critical debate on the nature of interdisciplinary work in the study of the human voice. The discussion explored the challenges that emerge when teams that include professionals with different approaches and expertise address voice production, as well as the inherent boundaries of the various roles and functions performed by specialized professionals in this field, along with the emerging ethical issues in this process. With a focus on strengthening interdisciplinary collaborations, the event centered on seeking more effective communication and collaboration. This document represents a significant step forward in understanding and fostering interdisciplinary cooperation in the care of the human voice. ©Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud.
      13
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Una perspectiva computacional y de análisis estadístico de textos para el Análisis de Sentimiento de la conversación en redes sociodigitales alrededor de debates electorales
    (Universidad Panamericana, Escuela de Comunicación, 2023)
    Espitia, Diego
    ;
    Atilano, Julián
    ;
    Zumaya, Martín
    Este trabajo analiza el impacto de las redes sociales en la imagen mediática y la percepción pública de los candidatos en los debates electorales del Estado de México de 2023, utilizando herramientas computacionales y estadísticas para examinar el sentimiento de 40,866 tweets. Se identificaron mayormente menciones negativas hacia Delfina Gómez de la coalición “Juntos hacemos historia”. Sin embargo, a pesar de esto, su campaña fue efectiva en transmitir su imagen mediática, destacándose la palabra “maestra” en las publicaciones sobre ella. Por otro lado, la imagen de Alejandra del Moral de la alianza “Va por el Estado de México” no tuvo el mismo impacto mediático en los tweets analizados. Este estudio muestra la relevancia de las redes sociales en las estrategias de campaña modernas, evidenciando cómo las discusiones digitales influencian la construcción de la imagen de los candidatos. La combinación de análisis cuantitativo y cualitativo permite entender no solo la cantidad de menciones, sino también el contexto y la evolución de la percepción pública. Este enfoque proporciona una metodología alternativa para analizar eventos políticos y sociales en la era digital.
      2  80