CRIS

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://scripta.up.edu.mx/handle/20.500.12552/1

Browse

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Gallagher, MartinSubject: search.filters.subject.Consensus

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    A survey on the methodological processes and policies of renal guideline groups as a first step to harmonize renal guidelines
    (2014)
    Haller, Maria C.
    ;
    Veer, Sabine N. van der
    ;
    Nagler, Evi V.
    ;
    Tomson, Charlie
    ;
    Lewington, Andrew
    Background: Worldwide, several bodies produce renal guidelines, potentially leading to duplication of effort while other topics may remain uncovered. A collaborative work plan could improve efficiency and impact, but requires a common approved methodology. The aim of this study was to identify organizational and methodological similarities and differences among seven major renal guideline bodies to identify methodological barriers to a collaborative effort. Methods: An electronic 62-item survey with questions based on the Institute of Medicine standards for guidelines was completed by representatives of seven major organizations producing renal guidelines: the Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN), European Renal Best Practice (ERBP), Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO), Kidney Health Australia-Caring for Australians with Renal Insufficiency (KHA-CARI), Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI), Sociedad Latino-Americano de Nefrologia e Hipertension (SLANH) and United Kingdom Renal Association (UK-RA). © Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
    Scopus© Citations 8  9  1