Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
La relación de la voluntad con las pasiones según Buenaventura de Bagnoregio y Tomás de Aquino
(2017)
Tellez-Maqueo, David-Ezequiel
Both Aquinas and Bonaventure have dedicated some passages of their commentary on Peter Lombard's Sentences to address the role of passions vis-à-vis the self-mastery performed by the will. In order to underscore the differences between both proposals, some authors (v.gr. N. LOMARDO, The Logic of Desire) have posed the existence of a better capability of will in Aquinas to rule the passions of the concupiscible and irascible appetites, as opposed to a less availability of the passions to be manageable in Bonaventure, seemingly due to a supposed autonomy of the passions before the will and as if they were an inherent 'threat' to virtue according to the latter. This article discuss to what extent that comparison portraits Bonaventure's opinion on the matter. © 2017 Vita e Pensiero/Pubblicazioni dell'Universitá Cattolica del Sacro Cuore.
16 2
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
La ira en Tomás de Aquino y Casiano : dos aproximaciones en torno a un tema común
(Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Departamento de Filosofía, 2018)
Tellez-Maqueo, David-Ezequiel
Although Cassian's vision emphasizes the inconveniences wrought by anger in the moral life, Thomas Aquinas recognizes the validity of being angry at the right person and at the right time. This is an undeniable disagreement between both of them, as Michael Rota has noted. However, it is a fact that Cassian's positive view on the issue has not been highlighted enough. The aim of this article is to show the valuable psychological aspect that might be present in his doctrine on anger, and if there is any possible point of contact with Aquinas's account. © 2018 Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Department of Philosophy. All rights reserved.
28 2
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Presencia de Agustín de Hipona y algunos filósofos antiguos en la noción filosófica de ira de Francisco de Sales
(2023)
Tellez-Maqueo, David-Ezequiel
This article aims to analyze Francis de Sales’s notion of anger from a philosophical perspective, something uncommon among their interpreters, more inclined to draw near him as a theologian. For this purpose, I’m putting the issue in context from the current debate in Ancient Philosophy between Seneca and Aristotle concerning the morality of anger and its anthropological value, followed by Augustine of Hippo’s account of anger. Secondly, I address some anthropological considerations on anger carried out by Francis de Sales through some Greek, Medieval and Monastic authors with whom his thought is related. Finally, I make an appraisal of the Salesian stance about the moral value of anger, emphasizing that Francis de Sales was not a Stoic thinker. At the same time, he separates himself from the Aristotelian position on the matter.©Revista Pensamiento, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Departamento de Filosofía, Humanidades y Comunicación | Facultad de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, Universidad de Comillas
43 2

CRIS

Browse

Filters

Settings

Sort By

Results per page

Search Results