CRIS
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://scripta.up.edu.mx/handle/20.500.12552/1
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Entre la “actualidad”, la filosofía “venidera” y el “origen”: ribetes críticos en las filosofías de Walter Benjamin y Theodor Adorno(Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2022)Rita Moreno, MaríaEn este artículo examino la vinculación entre los conceptos de “actualidad”, “venidero” y “origen”, presentes en las reflexiones tempranas de Walter Benjamin y Theodor W. Adorno, con el objetivo de exponer algunos de los ribetes definitorios de la transposición de la crítica efectuada por ambos filósofos. A partir de la determinación de “actualidad” como reflexión sobre las condiciones dentro de las cuales es legítima la filosofía, “venidero” como exigencia de autojustificación del conocimiento filosófico y “origen” como reclamo de lo históricamente inconcluso, muestro en qué sentido el horizonte crítico es recuperado por Benjamin y Adorno en cuanto ejercicio inexorable de la praxis filosófica.5 56 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Can We Identify the Theorem in Metaphysics 9, 1051a24-27 with Euclid’s Proposition 32? Geometric Deductions for the Discovery of Mathematical Knowledge(Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2023)Ortiz Delgado, Francisco MiguelThis paper has two specific goals. The first is to demonstrate that the theorem in MetaphysicsΘ 9, 1051a24-27 is not equiva-lent to Euclid’s Proposition 32 of book I (which contradicts some Aristotelian commentators, such as W. D. Ross, J. L. Heiberg, and T. L. Heith). Agreeing with Henry Mendell’s analysis, I ar-gue that the two theorems are not equivalent, but I offer different reasons for such divergence: I propose a pedagogical-philosoph-ical reason for the Aristotelian theorem being shorter than the Euclidean one (and the previous Aristotelian versions). Aristotle wants to emphasize the deductive procedure as a satisfactory method to discover scientific knowledge. The second objective, opposing some consensus about geometrical deductions/theo-rems in Aristotle, is to briefly propose that the theorem, exactly as we found it in Metaphysics and without any emendation to the text (therefore opposing Henry Mendell’s suggested amend-ments), allows the ancient philosopher to demonstrate that universal mathematical knowledge is in potence in geometrical figures. This tentatively proves that Aristotle emphasizes that geometrical deduction is sufficient to actualize mathematical knowledge9 24