Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Concordance among patients and physicians about their ideal of autonomy impacts the patient-doctor relationship: A cross-sectional study of Mexican patients with rheumatic diseases

2020 , Pascual-Ramos, Virginia , Contreras-Yáñez, Irazú , Ortiz-Haro, Ana Belén , Molewijk, Albert Christiaan , Obrador, Gregorio , Agazzi, Evandro

Introduction: In patient-doctor interaction both parties play a role. Primary objective was to determine if the concordance among rheumatologists and their patients of their ideal of autonomy was associated with a better patient-doctor relationship. Secondary objective was to describe factors associated to a patient paternalistic ideal of autonomy (PPIA). Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study had 3 steps. Step-1 consisted in translation/cultural local adaption of Ideal Patient Autonomy Scale (IPAS), a 14-items Dutch questionnaire. Step-2 consisted of IPAS validity and reliability in 201 outpatients. Step-3 consisted of the application of IPAS and the patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ) to 601 outpatients with a medical encounter, and of IPAS to the 21 attending rheumatologists. Each patient-physician encounter was classified into with/without concordance in the ideal of autonomy and PRDQ scores were compared (Man Whitney U test). Regression analysis was used for associations. ©PLOS One

No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Factors associated with the quality of the patient-doctor relationship: a cross-sectional study of ambulatory Mexican patients with rheumatic diseases

2021 , Pascual-Ramos, Virginia , Contreras-Yáñez, Irazú , Ortiz-Haro, Ana Belén , Molewijk, Albert Christiaan , Obrador, Gregorio , Agazzi, Evandro

Background: The patient-doctor relationship (PDR) is a complex phenomenon with strong cultural determinants, which impacts health-related outcomes and, accordingly, does have ethical implications. The study objective was to describe the PDR from medical encounters between 600 Mexican outpatients with rheumatic diseases and their attending rheumatologists, and to identify factors associated with a good PDR. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed. Patients completed the PDRQ-9 (Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire, 9 items), the HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index), the Short-Form 36 items (SF-36), a pain–visual analog scale, and the Ideal Patient Autonomy Scale. Relevant sociodemographic, disease-related, and treatment-related variables were obtained. Patients assigned a PDRQ-9 score to each patient-doctor encounter. Regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with a good PDR, which was defined based on a cutoff point established using the borderline performance method. Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.