Options
Agazzi, Evandro
Ethical Criteria for the Admission and Management of Patients in the ICU Under Conditions of Limited Medical Resources: A Shared International Proposal in View of the COVID-19 Pandemic
2020
,
Tambone, Vittoradolfo
,
Boudreau, Donald
,
Ciccozzi, Massimo
,
Sanders, Karen
,
Campanozzi, Laura Leondina
,
Wathuta, Jane
,
Violante, Luciano
,
Cauda, Roberto
,
Petrini, Carlo
,
Abbate, Antonio
,
Alloni, Rossana
,
Argemí Ballbé, Josepmaría
,
Argemí Renom, Josep
,
Benedictis, Anna De
,
Galerneau, France
,
Munive García, Carlos Emilio
,
Giampaolo Ghilardi
,
Palmer Hafler, Janet
,
Linden, Magdalena
,
Marcos, Alfredo
,
Onetti Muda, Andrea
,
Pandolfi, Marco
,
Pelaccia, Thierry
,
Picozzi, Mario
,
Revello, Ruben Oscar
,
Ricci, Giovanna
,
Rohrbaugh, Robert
,
Rossi, Patrizio
,
Sirignano, Ascanio
,
Spagnolo, Antonio Gioacchino
,
Stammers, Trevor
,
Velázquez, Lourdes
,
Mercurio, Mark
,
Agazzi, Evandro
The present pandemic has exposed us to unprecedented challenges that need to be addressed not just for the current state, but also for possible future similar occurrences. It is worth pointing out that discussions on the allocation of medical resources may not necessarily refer to an exception, but, unfortunately, to a regular condition for a large part of humanity (1). The criteria for admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting generally take into account multiple factors. There must be a diagnostic and prognostic basis for the decisions made, considering both biological factors and patient values and wishes. Furthermore, the decision-making process should, whenever possible, respect the patient's advance directives as well as the relationship with the patient's family or attorney. Therapeutic neglect should be avoided. Having applied standard clinical evaluation criteria for the appropriate treatment of patients with COVID-19, including consideration of prognosis, if a hospital then finds itself unable to provide optimal treatment (e.g., due to a disproportion between the number of patients and the availability of beds, healthcare providers, ventilators, and drugs in the ICU), it becomes necessary to evaluate, case by case, how to achieve justice and the best possible good for the greatest number of patients. It is therefore mandatory to explore alternative solutions; these include increasing available beds and healthcare providers, implementing alternative, though suboptimal, approaches (where appropriate), transferring patients to other clinical units, etc. Making these decisions properly also involves the recovery of the political role of medicine and science © Frontiers in Public Health