López-Farjeat, Luis Xavier
Thumbnail Image
Preferred name
López-Farjeat, Luis Xavier
Official Name
López Farjeat, Luis Xavier
Alternative Name
llopez
Main Affiliation
ORCID
Scopus Author ID
55671167500
Researcher ID
E-4047-2013

Research Output

Filters

3
3
Reset filters

Settings
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Religión y territorio en la filosofía política de al-Fārābī

2023 , López-Farjeat, Luis Xavier , Ganem Gutiérrez, José Alfonso

El presente artículo explora el uso del par terminológico dār al-islām/dār al-ḥarb, primero desde la perspectiva de la jurisprudencia islámica y, posteriormente, desde la relación entre religión (milla), nación (umma) y territorio (maskan) en la filosofía política de al-Fārābī. Se destaca cómo en el planteamiento de al-Fārābī no aparece la dicotomía dār al-islām/dār al-ḥarb y se explica que eso permite interpretar que, para el filósofo, la comunidad política y su demarcación geográfica no dependen necesariamente de su identidad religiosa. Por lo tanto, se argumenta que el planteamiento filosófico de al-Fārābī descarta la división de naciones en función de su identidad religiosa. Más allá de las simples diferencias entre la ciencia jurídica y la filosofía, el artículo examina la conceptualización del territorio de al-Fārābī y sus consecuencias para la filosofía política. © 2023 Colegio de Mexico, A.C., Departamento de Publicaciones. All rights reserved.

View
No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Group Asylum, Sovereignty, and the Ethics of Care

2020 , López-Farjeat, Luis Xavier , Coronado-Angulo, Cecilia

It is assumed that the states have the right to control their borders and decide whom they want to exclude, isolate, ban, or impose restrictions on. Although it seems that the problematic notion of “sovereignty” gives the state the right to make these kinds of decisions, there are situations where ethical duties to other human beings supersede sovereignty and where, in fact, those ethical duties limit sovereignty. This would be the case of group asylum situations. In this paper, we propose Axel Honneth’s ethics of recognition as a complement to the liberal notion of solidarity. By introducing a derivation of the ethics of recognition, namely, the “ethics of care,” we argue that our connection to others and the ethical duties we have with them impose some limits on the idea of sovereignty. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

View
No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Aristotle’s Categories in the Islamic Milieu Through the Syriac Tradition

2019 , López-Farjeat, Luis Xavier , Ganem Gutiérrez, José Alfonso

In recent years, the publication of several remarkable studies and translations centering on Eastern Christianity has drawn the attention of scholars interested in the reconstruction of the reception and dissemination of philosophical and medical works. These texts played a central role for adapting and adopting Greek philosophy into the Christian cultural setting of the Middle East, as well as the Islamic milieu.1 As is well known, Syriac, which was mainly used by Christians in this period, was the Semitic language that served as a mediator between Greek and Arabic. Consequently, there are cases in which Syriac translations are an important link for the interpretation of philosophical and theological concepts in Arabic. The aim of this article is to trace the influence and adaptation of Aristotle’s Categories in medieval Christian and Islamic contexts, particularly the way in which the Christian interpretation of this text provided helpful arguments for defining the nature of Christ and the Trinity, as well as the essence of divine attributes, by Christian and Muslim thinkers, respectively. Our hypothesis is that the Syriac version of the Categories and its interpretations played an influential role among Eastern Christians and, through this tradition, it is possible to trace the Christian influence on Islamic discussions on divine attributes. ©2019 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Wiley Online Library.

View