Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Universidad Panamericana
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Fundings & Projects
  • Researchers
  • Statistics
  • Feedback
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publications
  4. Kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) anemia work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for anemia in chronic kidney disease
 
  • Details
Options

Kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) anemia work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for anemia in chronic kidney disease

Journal
Kidney International Supplements
ISSN
2157-1716
Date Issued
2012
Author(s)
McMurray, John J. V.
Parfrey, Patrick S.
Adamson, John W.
Aljama, Pedro
Berns, Jeffrey S.
Bohlius, Julia
Drüeke, Tilman B.
Finkelstein, Fredric O.
Fishbane, Steven
Ganz, Tomas
Macdougall, Iain C.
McDonald, Ruth A.
McMahon, Lawrence P.
Obrador, Gregorio  
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud - CampCM  
Strippoli, Giovanni F. M .
Weiss, Günter
Wiecek, Andrzej
Type
Resource Types::text::journal::journal article
DOI
10.1038/kisup.2012.37
URL
https://scripta.up.edu.mx/handle/20.500.12552/2390
Abstract
The 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease aims to provide guidance on diagnosis, evaluation, management and treatment for all CKD patients (non-dialysis, dialysis, kidney transplant recipients and children) at risk of or with anemia. Guideline development followed an explicit process of evidence review and appraisal. The guideline contains chapters addressing diagnosis and evaluation of anemia in CKD and the use of various therapeutic agents (iron, ESAs and other agents) and red cell transfusion as means of treatment. Treatment approaches are addressed in each chapter and guideline recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant trials. Appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the GRADE approach. Ongoing areas of controversies and limitations of the evidence are discussed and additional suggestions are also provided for future research.

Copyright 2024 Universidad Panamericana
Términos y condiciones | Política de privacidad | Reglamento General

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by - Hosting & support SCImago Lab

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback