Repository logo
Communities
Research Outputs
Projects
Researchers
Statistics
  • Feedback
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publications
  4. Scientific Realism Within Perspectivism and Perspectivism Within Scientific Realism
Details

Scientific Realism Within Perspectivism and Perspectivism Within Scientific Realism

Journal
Axiomathes
ISSN
1122-1151
1572-8390
Date Issued
2016
Author(s)
Type
Resource Types::text::journal::journal article
DOI
10.1007/s10516-016-9304-4
URL
https://scripta.up.edu.mx/handle/20.500.12552/2302
Abstract
Perspectivism is often understood as a conception according to which subjective conditions inevitably affect our knowledge and, therefore, we are never confronted with reality and facts but only with interpretations. Hence, subjectivism and anti-realism are usually associated with perspectivism. The thesis of this paper is that, especially in the case of the sciences, perspectivism can be better understood as an appreciation of the cognitive attitude that consists in considering reality only from a certain ‘point of view’, in a way that can avoid subjectivism. Whereas the way of conceiving a notion is strictly subjective, the way of using it is open to intersubjective agreement, based on the practice of operations whose nature is neither mental nor linguistic. Therefore, intersubjectivity (that is a ‘weak’ sense of objectivity) is possible within perspectivism. Perspectivism can also help understand the notion of ‘scientific objects’ in a referential sense: they are those ‘things’ that become ‘objects’ of a certain science by being investigated from the ‘point of view’ of that science. They are ‘clipped out’ of things (and constitute the ‘domain of objects’ or the ‘regional ontology’ of that particular science) by means of standardized operations which turn out to be the same as those granting intersubjectivity. Therefore this ‘strong’ sense of objectivity, which is clearly realist, coincides with the ‘weak’ one. The notion of truth appears fully legitimate in the case of the sciences, being clearly defined for the regional ontology of each one of them and, since this truth can be extended in an analogical sense to the theories elaborated in each science, it follows that are real also the unobservable entities postulated by those theories. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Hosting & Support by

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify