Repository logo
Communities
Research Outputs
Projects
Researchers
Statistics
  • Feedback
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publications
  4. La figure d'Ulysse chez les Socratiques: Socrate polutropos
Details

La figure d'Ulysse chez les Socratiques: Socrate polutropos

Journal
Phronesis: A journal for Ancient Philosophy
ISSN
0031-8868
1568-5284
Publisher
Brill
Date Issued
2005
Author(s)
Lévystone, David 
Type
Resource Types::text::journal::journal article
DOI
10.1163/1568528054740168
URL
https://scripta.up.edu.mx/handle/20.500.12552/11610
Abstract
At the end of the fifth century B.C.E., the character of Odysseus was scorned by most of the Athenians: he illustrated the archetype of the demagogic, unscrupulous and ambitious politicians that had led Athens to its doom. Against this common doxa, the most important disciples of Socrates (Antisthenes, Plato, Xenophon) rehabilitate the hero and admire his temperance and his courage. But it is most surprising to see that, in spite of Odysseus' lies and deceit, these philosophers, who condemn steadfastly the sophists' deceptions, praise his rhetorical ability, his polutropia. The word polutropia is ambiguous: for Antisthenes, it means either "diversity of styles and discourses" or "diversity of dispositions, characters, or souls". It is argued that the same distinction is implicitly at work in Plato's Hippias Minor, where Socrates defends Odysseus' polutropia against the pseudo "simplicity" of Hippias' favourite hero, Achilles. However, whereas Antisthenes tries to clarify these different meanings, Plato's Socrates exploits the ambiguity to confuse his interlocutor. Such a distinction sheds a new light on the Hippias Minor: Odysseus is polutropos in the first (positive) sense, while the simplicity of Achilles should be understood as a bad kind of polutropia. It provides an explanation for the first paradoxical thesis of the dialogue which many commentators do not admit as an expression of the true Socratic view, on the ground of its supposed immorality: that he who voluntary deceives is better than he who errs, for falsehood is, in one case, only in words, while in the other, it is falsehood in the soul itself. It is thus proposed that Odysseus' skill in adapting his logos to his hearers was probably a model for Socrates himself. The analogy between the hero and Socrates is especially clear in Plato's dialogues, which show the philosopher in an Odyssey for knowledge. ©Brill ©The author
Subjects

Socrates

Plato

Antisthenes

Odysseus

Polytropia

License
Acceso Restringido
How to cite
Lévystone, D. (2005). La figure d'Ulysse chez les Socratiques: Socrate polutropos. In Phronesis: A journal for Ancient Philosophy (Vol. 50, Issue 3, pp. 181–214). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568528054740168

Hosting & Support by

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify