Intended delivery mode and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction
Journal
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
ISSN
1476-7058
1476-4954
Date Issued
2023
Author(s)
Rodriguez-Sibaja, Maria J.
Mendez-Piña, Miguel A.
Acevedo-Gallegos, Sandra
Velazquez-Torres, Berenice
Ramírez-Calvo, José A.
Type
text::journal::journal article
Abstract
Objective: To compare neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction (FGR) by intended delivery mode.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies with FGR that were delivered ≥34.0 weeks gestation. Neonatal outcomes were compared according to the intended delivery mode, which the attending obstetrician determined. Of note, none of the subjects had a contraindication to labor. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated via logistic regression models to assess the potential association between intended delivery mode and neonatal morbidity defined as a composite outcome (i.e. umbilical artery pH ≤7.1, 5-min Apgar score ≤7, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, hypoglycemia, intrapartum fetal distress requiring expedited delivery, and perinatal death). A sensitivity analysis excluded intrapartum fetal distress requiring emergency cesarean delivery from the composite outcome since only patients with spontaneous labor or labor induction could meet this criterion. Potential confounders in the adjusted effects models included maternal age, body mass index, hypertensive disorders, diabetes, FGR type (i.e. early or late), and oligohydramnios.
