CRIS
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://scripta.up.edu.mx/handle/20.500.12552/1
Browse
1037 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 1037
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Síndrome burnout y ajuste marital en un organismo internacional(Departamento de Psicología de la Universidad Católica Boliviana "San Pablo", 2007) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Framing the 'Clash of Civilization' in Europe: Interaction between Political and Media Frames(Academic Journals, 2009) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, La figure d'Ulysse chez les Socratiques: Socrate polutropos(Brill, 2005)Lévystone, DavidAt the end of the fifth century B.C.E., the character of Odysseus was scorned by most of the Athenians: he illustrated the archetype of the demagogic, unscrupulous and ambitious politicians that had led Athens to its doom. Against this common doxa, the most important disciples of Socrates (Antisthenes, Plato, Xenophon) rehabilitate the hero and admire his temperance and his courage. But it is most surprising to see that, in spite of Odysseus' lies and deceit, these philosophers, who condemn steadfastly the sophists' deceptions, praise his rhetorical ability, his polutropia. The word polutropia is ambiguous: for Antisthenes, it means either "diversity of styles and discourses" or "diversity of dispositions, characters, or souls". It is argued that the same distinction is implicitly at work in Plato's Hippias Minor, where Socrates defends Odysseus' polutropia against the pseudo "simplicity" of Hippias' favourite hero, Achilles. However, whereas Antisthenes tries to clarify these different meanings, Plato's Socrates exploits the ambiguity to confuse his interlocutor. Such a distinction sheds a new light on the Hippias Minor: Odysseus is polutropos in the first (positive) sense, while the simplicity of Achilles should be understood as a bad kind of polutropia. It provides an explanation for the first paradoxical thesis of the dialogue which many commentators do not admit as an expression of the true Socratic view, on the ground of its supposed immorality: that he who voluntary deceives is better than he who errs, for falsehood is, in one case, only in words, while in the other, it is falsehood in the soul itself. It is thus proposed that Odysseus' skill in adapting his logos to his hearers was probably a model for Socrates himself. The analogy between the hero and Socrates is especially clear in Plato's dialogues, which show the philosopher in an Odyssey for knowledge. ©Brill ©The authorScopus© Citations 34 11 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Le courage et les mots de la peur dans le Lachès et le Protagoras(Classical Association of Canada, 2006)Lévystone, DavidThe amount of attention that Plato gives to the virtue of courage can be interpreted as a symptom of the difficulties he faced in integrating it into his virtue science theory. His answers are never exactly the same, even in two dialogues of youth, the Laches and Protagoras, which are supposed to give a more accurate picture of the teaching of Socrates himself. Through an analysis of the terminology of fear in these two texts, it becomes clear that Plato, in distinguishing phobos from deos, implicitly agrees with the impossibility of simply reducing courage to science. This perspective is likely to modify our comprehension of the intellectualist theory of Socrates himself, at least with regard to courage. ©The author ©Classical Association of Canada9 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, 9 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Mariano ARTIGAS: La mente del universo, Pamplona: EUNSA 1999, 465 pp.(Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2000)Velázquez Fernández, HéctorMariano ARTIGAS: La mente del universo, Pamplona: EUNSA 1999, 465 pp.47 25 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Carlos LLANO: Examen filosófico del acto de la decisión, México: Universidad Panamericana / Publicaciones Cruz O., S. A. 1998, 205 pp.(Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2000)Ferrer Ortega, GuillermoCarlos LLANO: Examen filosófico del acto de la decisión, México: Universidad Panamericana / Publicaciones Cruz O., S. A. 1998, 205 pp.4 83 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Alfredo Marcos: Aristóteles y otros animales: una lectura filosófica de la biología aristotélica, Barcelona: Promociones y Publicaciones Universitarias 1996, 286 pp.(Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2000)Alfredo Marcos: Aristóteles y otros animales: una lectura filosófica de la biología aristotélica, Barcelona: Promociones y Publicaciones Universitarias 1996, 286 pp.20 34 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Tomás MELENDO: Dignidad humana y bioética, Pamplona: EUNSA 1999, 186 pp.(Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2000)Escandell, José J.Tomás MELENDO: Dignidad humana y bioética, Pamplona: EUNSA 1999, 186 pp.3 31 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Josep-Ignasi SARANYANA: Historia de la Filosofía medieval, Pamplona: EUNSA Colección Filosófica, n. 151, 1999, 388 pp.(Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2000)García Cuadrado, José ÁngelJosep-Ignasi SARANYANA: Historia de la Filosofía medieval, Pamplona: EUNSA Colección Filosófica, n. 151, 1999, 388 pp.5 54