CRIS
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://scripta.up.edu.mx/handle/20.500.12552/1
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, La lógica del don en las relaciones humanas: Economía y reciprocidad a la luz de los radicales polianos(2022); Moreno-Almárcegui, AntonioAimed at questioning the primacy of the contract over the logic of the gift in modernity, this paper compares and contrasts three archetypes of social relationships in light of the Polian radicals, as well as the types of reciprocity that derive from each of them. Modern, closed-dual reciprocity is opposed to open-triadic reciprocity, which characterizes gift-based relationships, both in their classical and Christian versions. This paper concludes that only the Christian radical, that of the person, can integrate the logic of the gift with a radical sense of freedom. Said radical starts with an anthropology that complements the practice of virtues as a way of moral perfection with an openness to transcendence and to aiding the neediest among us. © 2022 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra. All rights reserved.Scopus© Citations 1 10 2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, A Genealogy of the Gift(2017)This chapter takes a look at the gift, in which academic interest has recently grown, especially after the release of Benedict XVI’s social encyclical Caritas in Veritate. It outlines a genealogy of the gift, briefly presenting the three main stages of its evolution: (1) the ceremonial gift, typical of the ancient world and found in the cultural anthropological approach that the French tradition later adopted (Mauss, Caillé, Hénaff, etc.); (2) the moral gift, which Aristotle first outlined to explain the emergence of the city; and (3) the personal gift, developed in the Middle Ages thanks to Christian Revelation and its corresponding idea of the person. © Perspectives on Philosophy of Management and Business EthicsScopus© Citations 6 13 1
