CRIS

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://scripta.up.edu.mx/handle/20.500.12552/1

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Schleiermacher on Plato: From Form (Introduction to Plato’s Works) to Content (Outlines of a Critique of Previous Ethical Theory)
    (Brill, 2019)
    Plato was a major point of reference and important intellectual tool for numerous post-Kantian thinkers struggling to overcome Kant’s transcendental ideal ism, with its unwelcome division between the unknowable “thing in itself” and what the object is “for us” under the conditions of experience. Yet nowhere—not in Schlegel, Schelling, Humboldt, or Hegel—does Plato occupy a more central, stable, or elaborate place than in the work of Friedrich Schleiermacher.Interpreters have often spoken of Schleiermacher’s “Platonism”. While the exact implications of this general label need to be specified, it does capture the fact that Schleiermacher’s references to Plato throughout his philosophical works are numerous and usually very positive—indeed, always, when the first principles of philosophy are at stake. This is especially the case in his Discourses on Religion; his lectures on Dialectic, on Ethics, and Aesthetics; in various lectures given at the Berlin Academy; and most densely in the work I shall examine here in some detail, the Outlines of a Critique of Previous Ethical Theory (Grundlinien einer Kritik bisherigen Sittenlehre). ©The autor ©Brill
      8
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Aristotle’s Criticism of the Soul’s Self-Motion in DA I
    (Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2024)
    Sánchez Castro, Liliana Carolina
    In this paper, I examine Aristotle’s position on the theory of the soul as a self-moving entity in the light of a less nega-tive conception of his discussion with his predecessors. For this purpose, I discuss the hypothesis according to which Aristotle is producing the concepts necessary for his own research through a critique of Plato’s claims. I show that, more than a criticism, what we are witnessing is a process of conceptual appropriation where Aristotle filters an opinion to make a better use of it. I sup-port my argument by showing how Aristotle’s exegetical device works and how it could be connected to his own definitional procedures in De Anima’s book II.
      4  76
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Language as picture in Plato´s cratylus and Wittgenstein´s tractatus / Shlomy Mualem
    (Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2007)
    Mualem, Shlomy
    La intención del siguiente artículo es comparar las doctrinas del lenguaje como una pintura en Platón y Wittgenstein, concentrándose en el Cratilo y en el Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. A pesar de que el Cratilo trata sobre la corrección de los nombres mientras que el Tractatus atiende la naturaleza y estructura de las proposiciones, el estudio demuestra, centrado en Cratilo 421c-427e y Tractatus 4.01-4.12, que las doctrinas del lenguaje-como-pintura en estos textos se parecen en términos de sus propiedades básicas y su estructura. La comparación consta de cuatro aspectos: (1) la estructura de elementos y su forma; (2) la correspondencia entre lenguaje y realidad; (3) la posibilidad de la falsedad; y (4) el método de verificación
      22  58