Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5

Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Formación docente en competencias con enfoque humanista para adaptarse al cambio
(Universidad Panamericana, Escuela de Pedagogía, 2019-06-24)
Trejo Sánchez, Karina
;
Universidad Panamericana. Campus Ciudad de México. Escuela de Pedagogía
The essay describes a proposal for the development of competences with a humanist approach that considers programs for training teachers of all educational levels, since they are necessary to face today’s constant change in all aspects of life. The argument departs within the framework set in Unesco´s Delors report (1996), on Education for the Twenty First Century, based on the four pillars of learning, emphasizing the following types of knowledge: Learning to know, learning to do, learning to be and learning to live together. A blueprint for educational reform indispensable for humanity to progress towards the ideals of peace, freedom and social justice.
37 133
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Kant contra el leibnizianismo: El principio de sucesión y el problema del cambio en la Nova Dilucidatio de 1755
(Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2010)
Tocornal, Gastón Robert
El presente trabajo analiza y discute el principio de Sucesión, formulado por Kant en la Nova Dilucidatio de 1755. El principio, como se verá, demuestra la imposibilidad de dar cuenta satisfactoria de la posibilidad del cambio en un universo de sustancias causalmente aisladas y, en este sentido, constituye una refutación de la doctrina leibniziana de la armonía preestablecida. Luego de analizar con detalle los argumentos específicos que Kant provee en orden a justificar su posición, argumentaré que la crítica kantiana a los leibnizianos se refiere, en definitiva, a la tendencia, característica de los sistemas leibnizianos, a equiparar indiferenciadamente los niveles irreductibles de lo lógico y lo real y, con ello, a confundir los conceptos de fundamento lógico y causa real.
4 71
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Persistencia y continuidad del sustrato material en la física de Aristóteles
(Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2006)
Mié, Fabián, 1968-
"This article begins by showing that, according to Aristotle, the paradox of movement lies in the fact that, in order to account for movement, something permanent should be assumed. The author intends to show that Aristotle gets the concept of substratum out of the clarification of the different kinds of change, and that such a concept of substratum cannot be understood univocally. Aristotle argues that the substratum is necessary for keeping the indispensable continuity in change; so he maintains that the matter of change is a constitutive part of the product, the matter being a potential substratum. Mié wonders whether this theory of substratum leaves open the possibility of admitting an absolutely indeterminate matter that is able to assure the continuity at the most basic level of bodies. The author’s answer to this question is negative and he aims to show in what manner change can be explained without the guarantee of persistence, like that the prime matter attempted to reserve"--Pág. [69].
37 137
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Aristóteles contra Parménides: el problema del cambio y la posibilidad de una ciencia física
(Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2006)
Boeri, Marcelo D.
Este ensayo se propone presentar una lectura de las críticas de Aristóteles a Parménides en la Física. El autor sugiere que algunas importantes cuestiones que Aristóteles tiene en cuenta cuando determina los principios básicos de la ciencia de la naturaleza surgen de esas críticas. Boeri argumenta que, a pesar del fuerte desacuerdo declarado por Aristóteles en Física I 2-3 respecto de las posiciones eleáticas en general y la posición de Parménides en particular, Aristóteles aprovecha su discusión con Parménides de un modo constructivo a favor de su propia teoría del cambio y, en general, de las condiciones indispensables para la constitución de la ciencia de la naturaleza. Según el autor, uno de los puntos centrales del desacuerdo de Aristóteles con Parménides (la teoría del ser) es al mismo tiempo una de las más fértiles cuestiones desde el punto de vista del uso de Aristóteles de tal desacuerdo para establecer los fundamentos de su física.
12 95
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
The Lever, or how to act at a distance : a backdrop to Theophrastus' De sensibus
(2019)
It is well known that when it comes to perception in the De anima, Aristotle uses affection-related vocabulary with extreme caution. This has given rise to a debate between interpreters who hold that in Aristotle's account, the act of sense-perception nevertheless involves the physiological alteration of the sense organ (Richard Sorabji), and those think, with Myles Burnyeat, that for Aristotle, perception does not involve any material process, so that an Aristotelian physics of sense-perception is a "physics of forms alone". The present article suggests that the dematerialisation of Aristotle's theory of perception, which has a long story from Alexander of Aphrodisias to Brentano, may be in fact traced back to Theophrastus' exegesis of Aristotle's relevant passages in the De anima in his Physics, as we can reconstruct it on the basis of Priscian's Metaphrasis in Theophrastum and Simplicius' commentary of Aristotle's De Anima. The reconstruction also provides a scholastic-theoretical frame to Theophrastus' critical exposition of ancient theories about sense perception in his De sensibus, whether or not the discussion originally belonged to Theophrastus' Physics. © 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
Scopus© Citations 3 13 1

CRIS

Browse

Filters

Settings

Sort By

Results per page

Search Results