Exploring the vulnerability of practice-like activities: An ethnographic perspective
Journal
Frontiers in Sociology
ISSN
2297-7775
Date Issued
2022
Author(s)
Bolade-Ogunfodun, Yemisi
Sinnicks, Matthew
Akrivou, Kleio
Type
text::journal::journal article
Abstract
Introduction: This paper explores the vulnerability of practice-like activities to institutional domination. Methods: This paper offers an ethnographic case study of a UK-based engineering company in the aftermath of its acquisition, focusing in particular on its R&D unit. Results: The Lab struggled to maintain its practice-based work in an institutional environment that emphasized the pursuit of external goods. Discussion: We use this case to develop two arguments. Firstly, we illustrate the concept of “practice-like” activities and explore their vulnerability to institutional domination. Secondly, in light of the style of management on display after the takeover, we offer further support to MacIntyre's critique of management. Finally, based on the empirical data we reflect on the importance of organizational culture, as well as friendship and the achievement of a common good in business organizations for these kinds of activities. Copyright © 2022 Bolade-Ogunfodun, Sinnicks, Akrivou and Scalzo.
How to cite
Bolade-Ogunfodun, Y., Sinnicks, M., Akrivou, K., & Scalzo, G. (2022). Exploring the vulnerability of practice-like activities: An ethnographic perspective. Frontiers in Sociology, 7, 1003741. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.1003741