Repository logo
Communities
Research Outputs
Projects
Researchers
Statistics
  • Feedback
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publications
  4. Evaluating key factors for designing policies to foster research: insights from Mexican private universities
Details

Evaluating key factors for designing policies to foster research: insights from Mexican private universities

Journal
International Journal of Educational Management
ISSN
0951-354X
1758-6518
Publisher
Emerald
Date Issued
2025-06-26
Author(s)
Adrian Ramirez-Nafarrate
Juan E. Núñez-Ríos
Type
text::journal::journal article
DOI
10.1108/IJEM-03-2024-0153
URL
https://scripta.up.edu.mx/handle/20.500.12552/12220
Abstract
<jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>We implement the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to prioritize factors that can help university authorities and decision-makers incorporate researchers’ perspectives into the design of the incentives to bridge the gap between research strategic management and deployment in private universities. It highlights the importance of research institutionalization as a competitive factor.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p>The AHP helped to evaluate factors and sub-factors that influence the research incentive policies design, incorporating researchers’ situational knowledge as a key input.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>The results highlight three factors for effectively designing incentive policies to improve academic performance: work–life balance, research funding and institutional support.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Research limitations/implications</jats:title><jats:p>It is necessary to include public universities in the evaluation to improve incentive policies and research management. We also consider the AHP’s inability to account for cognitive biases, as the respondents’ expertise influences responses despite validation criteria to minimize these effects.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Practical implications</jats:title><jats:p>University authorities should incorporate tenure scholars into the research policy design, and the incentive program must consider factors such as work–life balance, adequate funding and institutional support when designing incentive policies to foster research productivity.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Social implications</jats:title><jats:p>The study highlights how a well-designed incentive policy can promote excellence in research and the welfare of academics, address sustainability goals, and thus contribute to the advancement of knowledge and the social impact of universities.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>This study contributes to the debate on improving the management of research promotion policies from the perspective of researchers, highlighting variations between the design of incentive policies and their perception by researchers.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Hosting & Support by

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify