Attitudes about principle of autonomy in Hispanic patients from a dynamic early rheumatoid arthritis cohort
Journal
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology
ISSN
0392-856X
Date Issued
2019
Author(s)
Pascual-Ramos, Virginia
Contreras-Yáñez, Irazú
Ruiz, Daniel
Type
Resource Types::text::journal::journal article
Abstract
Objetives: In 2004, we began assembling an incidental cohort of patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In February 2018, we performed a cross-sectional study with the objective to investigate patients' attitudes/knowledge regarding the autonomy principle. Methods: Patients currently attending the cohort (n=146) were invited to participate. A 4-dimensional questionnaire was administered, and a rheumatologic evaluation performed in the 143 patients who agreed to participate. Dimension-4 (D-4) included 7 multiple-choice (strongly agree-strongly disagree) sentences, 3 of which were related to patients' rights/obligations about health-related decisions (group-1), and 4 additional sentences challenged physician's recommendations (group-2). The D-4 score was considered a surrogate of knowledge autonomy (KA). Additionally, the surveyor scored KA with a Likert scale (poor, borderline and superior), and a cut-off point for poor KA was set using Borderline methodology. Mann-Whitney U-tests and logistic regression analysis were used. The study received IRB approval. RESULTS: At the time the questionnaire was administered, mean (±SD) patient age was 46.9 (±13.6) years, and median (interquartile range) cohort follow-up time was 8.8 (4.3-11.9) years. Fifty-one patients (35.6%) had poor KA; increased age (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 1.004-1.063, p=0.023) was associated with better KA. Patients more frequently agreed-strongly agreed with group-1 sentences than they did with group-2 sentences (86.7% vs. 58%, p≤0.001). The results were reproduced in the subpopulations with sufficient KA (98.9% vs. 88%, p=0.007) and poor KA for patients in whom the gap was extreme (64.9% vs. 3.9%, p≤0.001). Conclusions: Hispanic RA patients' sense of autonomy suggests paternalism in the physician-patient relationship.