Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
The Deductions of Freedom / Morality-as-Autonomy and the Categorical Imperative in Groundwork III and Their Problems
(Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2015)
Rudy Hiller, Fernando
The first objective of this paper is to present an interpretation of Groundwork III which aims to establish two main points: first, that Kant offers there a theoretically-grounded deduction (in Kantian sense) of freedom/morality-as-autonomy; second, that Kant also offers a separate deduction of the categorical imperative. Thus, contrary to what several commentators have claimed, Groundwork III contains a theoretically-grounded double deduction. The second objective of the paper is to examine and criticize in detail one crucial step in these deductions, namely, Kant’s inference from the speculative spontaneity of reason to the noumenal existence of the subject as a free will. I show that Kant himself came to reject this inference in the B edition of the Critique of Pure Reason, and argue that this explains Kant’s rejection, in the Critique of Practical Reason, of the deduction of the moral law he previously offered. Thus, contrary to the “reconciliationist” reading, there is indeed a great reversal in the latter work.
17 46
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Excuses and exemptions
(Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2015)
Del Corral, Miranda
Las excusas y las condiciones eximentes tienen como finalidad mitigar la responsabilidad. Este artículo propone una distinción entre excusas y eximentes basada en el tipo distintivo de juicio que cada una trata de responder. Argumento que los eximentes afectan la relevancia causal del acusado, mientras que las excusas lo justifican total o parcialmente, porque afectan al juicio evaluativo implícito en las atribuciones de responsabilidad. Esta distinción apoya una concepción de las atribuciones de responsabilidad como un proceso en dos etapas, donde cada una de ellas corresponde a un tipo diferente de responsabilidad (agencial y moral), cuya atribución está guiada por dos tareas cognitivas y argumentativas diferentes, aunque relacionadas: explicar lo que produjo una situación, y evaluar su significación moral
28 47

Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía

Browse

Filters

Settings

Sort By

Results per page

Search Results