Anzures Gurría, José Juan

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Titularidad y ejercicio de los derechos fundamentales en México
(Universidad de Talca, 2025)
;
El trabajo aborda la diferencia entre la titularidad y el ejercicio de los derechos fundamentales en México y analiza a diversos sujetos titulares de dichos derechos, tales como personas físicas, jurídicas, extranjeros, menores de edad, personas con discapacidad, etc. Mientras que la titularidad se refiere a la capacidad de toda persona por el hecho de pertenecer al género humano, el ejercicio es la condición para materializar los contenidos constitucionalmente protegidos de cada derecho. A pesar de que los derechos fundamentales son universales e iguales para todos, la titularidad de cada derecho dependerá del reconocimiento que la norma positiva determine para cada sujeto de derechos. En el caso del ejercicio, la condición jurídica del titular determinará si éste se realiza a través del autoejercicio o del heteroejercicio.©Los autores ©Ius et Praxis ©Universidad de Talca. The paper addresses the difference between the ownership and the exercise of fundamental rights in Mexico and specifically analyses each holder of fundamental rights, such as natural persons, legal persons, foreigners, minors, disabled persons, etc. While the holding refers to the capacity of every person by virtue of belonging to the human race, the exercise of rights refers to the capacity to act in order to materialise the protected scope of each right. Although rights are universal and equal for all, the holding of each right will depend on the recognition of the norm. In the case of exercise, the legal status of the holder will determine whether this is carried out through self-exercise or hetero-exercise©The authors ©Ius et Praxis ©Universidad de Talca.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Freedom of Association in Mexico
(Brill, 2024)
Freedom of association has been constitutionally recognized in Mexico since the mid-19th century. But it has been in recent years that academic scholarship and case law have constructed its content and scope. It is a freedom right that requires the performance of a negative conduct on the part of the State. Its constitutionally protected scope comprises a positive, a negative, as well as a collective dimension. Additionally, it is an instrumental right through which other fundamental rights can be exercised and the constitutional and democratic Rule of Law is consolidated. The greatest academic scholarship and case law development in Mexico refers to two specific types of associations: political parties and labor unions. ©Brill ©The author.
10
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Sobre la democracia sindical. A propósito de la reforma laboral de 30 de noviembre de 2012
(2014)
In the recent labor reform of November 30th, 2012, one of the most debated issues in the Chamber of Deputies and in the Senate, was the union democracy, introduced in article 371, clause IX, of the Federal Labor Law when it was reformed. The concept of union democracy is surrounded by ambiguity, and this reform adopted a limited point of view of the concept due to the secret and direct or indirect election of the Union Directives. Therefore, this paper aims to provide some clarification of this concept, advocating for a broader conception that includes multiple definitions, and claiming that Unions observed in their internal structure a democratic regime due to the particularity of their legal nature and the importance of their roles in the consolidation and maintenance of a social and democratic rule of law. ©Cuestiones Constitucionales
16 1

Anzures Gurría, José Juan

Filters

Settings

Sort By

Results per page