Ross, Alberto
Main Affiliation
Preferred name
Ross, Alberto
Official Name
Ross Hernández, José Alberto
ORCID
0000-0002-8680-2068
Researcher ID
JSK-2926-2023
Scopus Author ID
57191591274
20 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 20
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Lenguajes del pensar medieval y renacentista : Iustitia et Iure 2016(Universidad Panamericana, 2018); ; 38 44 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Réplica a: nuevos sentidos del concepto de μίμησις en la poética de Aristóteles(Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2005); JOSE ALBERTO ROSS HERNANDEZ;39061“En la réplica, quisiera centrarme en dos cosas. En primer lugar, en el énfasis que pone la autora en la noción de "hilazon" (perainousa), pues resulta muy sugerente, incluso para la interpretación de otros textos del mismo Aristóteles, En concreto, me parece que esa noción puede ser interesante para un lector de las obras aristotélicas de Filosofía de la Naturaleza, como es mi caso. En la Física, por mencionar alguna de sus obras, Aristóteles echa mano en varias ocasiones de ejemplos tomados de la actividad artística como parte de su, argumentación”--Pág. [235].34 15 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, La defensa aristotélica del uso de explicaciones teleológicas en Física II 8(Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Filosofía, 2006); JOSE ALBERTO ROSS HERNANDEZ;39061Este ensayo intenta ofrecer una reconstrucción de los argumentos de Aristóteles del uso de explicaciones teleológicas en Física II 8. En su exposición de los pasajes seleccionados Ross pone cierto énfasis en el carácter dialógico del discurso para hacer una modesta contribución a la solución de dos acertijos: uno de carácter exegético, y el otro sistemático. Esta lectura permite al autor introducir un nuevo elemento en la discusión concerniente a qué alcances y límites hay de las explicaciones teleológicas en la Física de Aristóteles. En opinión de Ross, esta estrategia es útil para adelantar en la comprensión de cuál es el tipo de argumentos que pueden ofrecerse cuando lo que se está considerando es si la teleología o el mecanicismo son el esquema explicativo más apropiado para dar cuenta de los fenómenos naturales.29 18 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Causality of the Prime Mover in Metaphysics Λ(2016)The aim of this paper is to propose a critical revision of the traditional interpretation of Met. Λ, according to which the Aristotelian Prime Mover is the final cause that explains the eternal movement of the heaven, rather than a formal or an efficient cause postulated for the same purpose. The importance of this discussion is widely acknowledged, and it is a subject upon which there is no unanimous agreement among interpreters. The different accounts of the causal relationship between the Unmoved Mover and the physical world have given rise to one of the most recurrent controversies in the history of the transmission of the Corpus Aristotelicum, and it is a question that does not admit simple or simplistic answers. ©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH1 25 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Cause and Explanation in Aristotle: Logos, Eidos, and TroposThe aim of this chapter is to propose a reconstruction of the Aristotelian notion of aitia. I will attempt to justify that, through this notion, Aristotle proposes a doctrine regarding the different ways to explain something, which is not necessarily linked to a specific cosmology. If we read closely his exposition about what is an aitia and the classifications according to their eidos and their tropos, we find a fruitful theory both from a historical and from a thematic point of view. This can be justified by identifying the methodological moment in which its exposition is found and in the kind of examples used. To prove this thesis, I will comment some passages of Ph. II 3 and Metaph. V 1–3 in order to show what is common between species and modes of aitiai. After that, I will analyze these classifications and attempt to show that they provide us with a wide variety of options to answer the question about why something is the case. I will also try to prove that they are not necessarily linked to a specific physics or cosmology. ©Routledge17 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Value Systems and Their Influence on Managerial Mindsets and Managers’ Volitions(2020)1 19 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Abstracción y presencia : observaciones sobre los orígenes de la filosofía en Leonardo PoloEl propósito de este trabajo es presentar algunos aspectos de la recepción de la filosofía antigua en Leonardo Polo. En particular, este artículo se centrará en su explicación acerca del origen histórico del pensamiento filosófico. Polo sostiene que si la abstracción es la primera operación intelectual, la filosofía griega es la primera filosofía. En su opinión, su propuesta epistemológica tiene verificación histórica y apela a los filósofos antiguos para probarlo. En este contexto, sus referencias a los pensadores griegos tienen un propósito temático, y no sólo historiográfico. ©2016 Studia Poliana, Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra1Scopus© Citations 1 20 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Normativity and Ethical Foundations in AristotleThis paper examines the problem of normativity and ethical grounding in Aristotle through a close analysis of the ergon argument in Nicomachean Ethics I.7. After reconstructing the structure of the argument, it distinguishes two broad interpretative models: a foundationalist reading, which grounds ethics in Aristotle's speculative philosophy, and a minimalist or non-foundationalist reading, which understands the argument as ethically self-standing. The paper argues that the ergon argument admits both interpretations but defends the minimalist approach as textually and methodologically preferable. On this view, the normative force of the argument does not derive from metaphysical premises but from its role within ethical inquiry itself. This interpretation aligns with Aristotle's methodological remarks and preserves the practical orientation of his ethical project. © The author. © 2026 selection and editorial matter, Daniel Doyle Sánchez and Manuel C. Ortiz de Landázuri; individual chapters, the contributors. All rights reserved.5 3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Cause and Explanation in Ancient PhilosophyThis volume offers an updated analysis of the use, meaning, and scope of the classical notion of aitia. It clarifies philosophical and philological questions about aitia and offers bold and innovative interpretations of this key concept of ancient philosophy. The numerous meanings and nuances of aitia remain difficult to grasp. Ancient philosophers use aitia to explain the existence and activity of substances, bodies, souls, or gods. Paradoxically, its own definition remains difficult to establish. This book reconstructs some of the most important uses, variants, and scopes of the term aitia within different philosophical perspectives in antiquity, including early Greek philosophy, Plato, Aristotle, Stoicism, and Islamic philosophy. The chapters analyze metaphysical aspects, epistemological issues, and logical implications of aitia. They engage with the most relevant critical literature generated in several modern languages. In doing so, they offer an inclusive and overarching re-evaluation of our assumptions about causation and explanation in ancient philosophy. Cause and Explanation in Ancient Philosophy will be of interest to scholars and advanced students working on Pre-Socratic philosophy, Plato, Aristotle, Hellenistic philosophy, late antiquity, and medieval philosophy. ©Routledge.13 3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, 9